Yeah, great game;
You have many problems to decide to move pawns, don't you? :D it looks like you learn by heart the chess afirmation: "the pawn can never go back"
For example, I don't know why you didn't play b3 sooner!
Nice game anyway
You have many problems to decide to move pawns, don't you? :D it looks like you learn by heart the chess afirmation: "the pawn can never go back"
For example, I don't know why you didn't play b3 sooner!
Nice game anyway
I thought by moving the b-pawn I'd have weakish dark squares – and, at that moment, they had a dark-squared bishop that could occupy those weak squares and torment me!
22. Nd5 must have been a satisfying move. ^^
#4, yup! :-)
I beat a higher rated opponent too, with a baseball bat though.
I too, once beat a higher rated opponent.
58 points rating difference, come on :P
I get use to beat strong titled players using my random openings attack.
" LM Dr-Zaitzev is an engine because he plays strange openings. He must be using Stockfish " .- Kingscrusher's notable quote.
" LM Dr-Zaitzev is an engine because he plays strange openings. He must be using Stockfish " .- Kingscrusher's notable quote.
I've never really liked Kingcrusher.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.