lichess.org
Donate

stockfish vs chatgpt!

As many other have explained in this forum before, ChatGPT is a language model. It cannot play chess. It can pretend to do so because there are also chess games in the training texts, using the usual notation. But ChatGPT doesn't have the means to analyse new positions, calculate ahead and decide whether moves are legal or not.
@hydroshadow said in #6:
> please read the whole study before you comment, thanks
> it is a marvellous game
> @aVague @canaligece @chesscats20
you mean read comments on game where move written? I still didn't got , what to see there
a Game means there should be more than 5 move, especially vs SF, also why no analysis allowed? what 's the point?
@aVague
There's a study hidden there, you'll find the link under the "three dot" icon.

But it's pretty pointless. Just to illustrate the point that ChatGPT has no inbuilt deduction mechanism to apply the rules of chess to new positions:

I gave the following prompt:

User:
"Consider the following chess position: Black King on a8. Black Queen on e8. White Knight on e5. White King on e1. White to move. Please list all legal moves for the white Knight on e5."

[note: the knight is pinned, there are no legal moves for the knight]

ChatGPT:
"In the given chess position, with the Black King on a8, Black Queen on e8, White Knight on e5, and White King on e1, the legal moves for the White Knight on e5 are as follows:

Nc6
Nd7
Nxf6+
Ng3
Nh4"

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.